Strengthening the Pillars of Free Press: Support the Society of Professional Journalists Foundation.
The free press is more than just an institution; it represents the foundation of our nation and the freedoms we cherish. Your support is not just appreciatedit's essential. With your help, we can ensure that the light of responsible journalism continues to shine brightly, illuminating the path forward for our democracy. Help us reach our year-end goal of raising $50,000.
Donate Today
FOI and Privacy
What about my right to privacy?
But shouldn’t the government protect my privacy?
So, if I want to find out information about my neighbor,
all I have to do is ask?
If FOI is such a good idea, why do the media do so many
scary stories about too much information being available?
What about my right to privacy?
First, the right to privacy generally refers to activities in your private
life – your identity, your home, your family, your medical history, your
employment history, your financial decisions, your movements, your religion,
your beliefs, your vices.
Second, in a more practical way, the right to privacy means the right to decide
with whom you share your personal information. Even so, we don’t always
get to decide who sees our information
America is considered an “open” society, in which we conduct most
of our business in public. We waive our right to privacy regularly by providing
personal information, or at least access to it, to people we don’t know.
Consider the following:
Most of us have our address and telephone number listed in the
phone book.
If you write a check at a store and a clerk asks to see your
driver’s license, you voluntarily show it.
If you apply for a loan or a home mortgage, you have to provide
quite a bit of personal financial information.
Private businesses collect a great deal of information on your
spending habits. Every time you use a credit card you create a
record that may be shared with people other than the store and
your bank. Some businesses ask for information such as your
address or home phone number even on cash purchases,
ostensibly for their “customer database” or to qualify you for
special services. (It may also qualify you to receive unsolicited
material from that business or a related company.)
Even something as seemingly innocuous as a magazine
subscription or a product warranty card asks for personal
information and, once you provide it, you don’t know who will see
it or how they will use it.
But shouldn’t the government
protect my privacy?
In many cases, the government does just that. For instance, your individual
income tax returns are not available to other people. The federal government
mandates that your medical and employment records not be shared with people
other than those authorized to see them. The Freedom of Information Act and
the federal Privacy Act protect individual privacy, as do state open records
laws.
Admittedly, the government may take an interest in aspects of your life you
would consider private, but it may do so only for good cause. For that information
to become publicly available may take extraordinary circumstances – a
court trial, for instance.
So, if Iwant to find out information
about my neighbor, all I have to do is ask?
It may not be quite that simple. You had better have a good idea what you’re
after before you go looking for information. You won’t get anywhere just
walking into City Hall or your state Capitol and asking for “all you have
on Robert Jones.”
For instance, if you want to check on your neighbor’s driving record,
you should make sure you can clearly identify that person.
Probably the most important single law protecting individual privacy is the
federal Privacy Act of 1974. This law (5 U.S.C. § 552A) sets forth the
rules under which the federal government’s executive branch collects,
manages and shares information about individual Americans in records “systems.”
The “systems” definition is a key element of the Privacy Act. Here’s
how a Tennessee legal site’s guide to the Privacy Act describes it:
A record contains individually identifiable information, including
but not limited to information about education, financial transactions, medical history, criminal history, or employment history. A “system of records” is a group of records from which information is actually retrieved by name, Social Security number, or other identifying symbol assigned to an individual.
Some personal information is not kept in a system of records. This information is not subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act, although access may be requested under the FOIA. Most personal information in government files is subject to the Privacy Act.(From http://www.tncrimlaw.com)
Simply put, the Privacy Act requires the federal government to provide information
about its records systems and to allow an individual to have access to his or
her own personal information and to correct any erroneous information in government
files.
The law also prohibits federal executive branch agencies from sharing a citizen’s
personal information with other agencies or with people outside of government
unless the request meets certain criteria. And it provides penalties for violations.
To read the Privacy Act in
its entirety, visit the federal Department of Justice.
If FOI is such a good idea, why do the
media do so many scary stories about too much information being available?
Let’s face it – the media sometimes do stories because they can
get people’s attention. In today’s world, where safety and security
are not guaranteed, people understandably may be nervous about who has access
to sensitive information. Fear can be a powerful motivator.
We don’t want “the bad guys” getting their hands on information
they can use to do us harm, whether it’s national security secrets or
our personal identity or finances.
The stories that often do the most damage are those that take an individual
case and ask, “Could this happen to you?”
While these kinds of stories can be compelling, they may have nothing to do
with government-held information. Chances are, the criminal used information
easily found in the private sector.
To the frustration of knowledgeable FOI advocates, some of those stories have
become rallying cries for more restrictions on government records in the name
of protecting individual privacy.
Unfortunately, the effect of those stories is to focus almost exclusively on
the plight of the individual without examining the benefits of keeping certain
kinds of information available to the public.