Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Top picks!

Compilation news sites are extremely useful. The compiled news site I use most often is GoogleNews.
But I've recently noticed the ability to rank stories by number of hits is growing in popularity. One such site is Digg. Another is Del.icio.us. Both I found through a celebrity gossip Web site - a far cry from what I consider news.
Users of the sites can post or recommend a Web page. The stories selected most often by users head to the top of the page.
This works similar to the Google or Yahoo! "most viewed articles" link.
This loosely-democratic form of gate-keeping is really a great concept, allowing readers to hand-pick their own front page, but at the same time, the stories that often are linked here are in no way serious news stories.
People tend to click more often on soft stories, 'weird' news and even blog posts.
That kind of 'news' is fun to read but I hope users of top viewed articles also check out the more important stuff so they will be aware and active citizens who actually know what's going on in the world, things like who's running for president and the state of the war in Iraq or community news that directly affects the reader. And maybe serious, community-affecting news will make it to the top of the list.
My wish is that everyone strives to be more aware, and to gain understanding and knowledge throughout life. I know this is probably futile, as many people don't know who their senators are, but a girl can hope!
What are your top news stories day to day? Do they focus on serious news or fluffy stories? Do we prefer features to hard news?
Do SPJ blog readers subscribe to sites like Digg or use compilation news sites?
Is this the direction media's headed?
Published Friday, September 21, 2007 6:06 PM by ElysseJames

Comments

# re: Top picks!

Friday, September 21, 2007 7:15 PM by Dale Denwalt II
I usually hit the hard news first, political stuff and international stories. My preference is the Yahoo news aggregator, but the featured stories up top are usually just a waste of my time. After looking quickly at the top news, I click on over to world news to get the important news.

My biggest concern is if the news aggregator editors have any journalism background, or if they understand ethics.

# re: Top picks!

Friday, September 21, 2007 7:36 PM by ElysseJames
That's pretty much what I do too, on GoogleNews. I like to check out the business headlines too in case there's something interesting.

Hm. I wonder if they do have a journalism background. It would be useful, and appropriate.
Does anyone know?

# Top picks!

Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:12 AM by John
Thank you for the nice post. I enjoy reading your posts. Thank you for the
time and effort you spend for keeping blog lively and attractive and that
makes it worth visiting and re-visiting.

# re: Top picks!

Monday, September 24, 2007 3:00 AM by Alex
I often check out Yahoo's front page, but am always refreshing the Chicago Tribune's site.  Much like Digg, the top stories are the ones that are most popular with readers, so it allows some sort of news aggregation.

# re: Top picks!

Monday, September 24, 2007 10:27 AM by Jeremy
I don't think aggregators and Digg-type sites are the future of news. Compilations sites only work because they have news to compile. Digg-type sites -- which do indeed feature "soft" news, weird stuff and blog hits -- function as noted because there are sites where hard news is ranked by professionals. No matter how much Internet 2 is hyped, people are still interested in credible original content and still enjoy letting a trusted professional select their daily dose of news. Not everyone is an internet junky or a news addict.
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.